The US administration's decision to increase beef imports has drawn criticism from farmers.

The administration's decision, aimed at reducing food costs, particularly beef, has sparked a sharp reaction from industry representatives. Tynee Brunner, head of the Montana Stockgrowers Association, described these measures as having a negative impact on the economic position of farms. Many farmers, who have already faced falling prices at auctions, are concerned about the future profitability of their business.

According to the proclamation of August 26, the government plans to allow the import of beef at a 25% discount below market value. The duration of this 90-day program coincides with the "autumn run" of livestock, when the market is traditionally saturated with supply, which further increases producers' concerns. At the same time, precise information about the supplying countries and the places where the products will be sold is absent from the documents, and the US Department of Agriculture has not provided clarifying information.

Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins noted that this measure is temporary and is intended to fill gaps in supply chains that have emerged against the backdrop of long-term industry challenges. It is worth noting that the country's cattle population has reached a 75-year low, which is explained by the consequences of the pandemic, prolonged droughts, and rising costs. Additional pressure on production costs is exerted by the rising price of fuel and fertilizer, as well as trade disputes with Canada.

The White House's actions have also caused disagreement among Republican congressmen. A number of senators, including Tim Sheehy of Montana and Mike Rounds of South Dakota, stated that this step is inappropriate. Representatives of legislative bodies emphasize that such decisions hinder the recovery of the domestic herd and propose the implementation of a mandatory country-of-origin labeling system to ensure fairer competition in the market.